Turkey has major gaps in its AML regime - Construction of the new Golden Horn Metro Bridge, in Istanbul (2013).
Conflict rages just over the border in Syria yet Turkey goes slow
(even backwards with recent amendments of its customs code) on
terrorist financing. So, what is the agenda? asks Paul Cochrane.
Turkey
may be on the frontline of the so-called 'war on terror,' but its new
customs code asks no questions of incoming cash, while its definition
of terrorism has been criticised for contrasting with international
standards. Furthermore, judicial independence and reliability of the
rule of law in the country are both often in issue.
Turkey's
geographical positioning has always made it a crossroads between east
and west. The country is a conduit for the heroin trade flowing to
Europe from Afghanistan, a gray market exchange and trade hub for
(sanctioned) Iran, and an entry point for fighters joining the ranks
of the Islamic State (IS) and other radical groups in conflict-ridden
Syria and Iraq. The country has also experienced multiple terrorist
attacks over the past 12 months, including a devastating attack in
the capital Ankara in March this year which killed 32 people.
Free
cash flow
Yet
despite myriad of problems, and removal from Financial Action Task
Force (FATF) ongoing monitoring in 2014, Ankara has enacted
legislation that would seem to be a gift to money launderers,
organised crime and terrorism financiers.
In
April, 2015, the Ministry of Customs and Trade amended the 2013
Customs Code, making it two pages shorter (now four), and allowing
any amount of cash to enter or leave the country – the previous
limit was US$50,000. “Frankly, why does it matter if the money
comes in cash or through a bank as long as it is money earned from
exports? If this is dirty money, it will not be allowed to enter the
country. There are no changes with regard to unrecorded cash,” said
the Minister of Customs and Trade, Nurettin Canikli, arguing that the
newer code represented a simplification, as the previous version,
albeit had been in line with EU regulations, was “unclear".
Canikli's
statement, though, is not supported by the new code's text,
which reads: “Revenues from the export of goods and services,
revenues with regard to transit trade, cash from foreign capital and
other resources are free to enter the country through custom gates.
[The value of] the items is not required to be declared and
passengers cannot be forced to make declarations.”
With
the economy slowing down and the Lira having dropped by over 20
percent against the US dollar since 2014, the move is seen as a way
to foster the return of much-needed Turkish cash. “It is more of an
effort to repatriate holdings abroad than help terrorists or money
launderers but, regardless of the intentions, it does open the door
to these types of transactions,” said Atilla Yesilada,
Istanbul-based analyst at Global Source Partners Inc, an
international business advisory service. “As IS has a pernicious
and pervasive network in Turkey, I speculate that there's no way to
distinguish between legal money coming into the country and cash to
help IS and other [designated terrorist groups] like Al Nusra Front.
From a domestic viewpoint, it's a big problem.”
The
new customs code is but one sign of Ankara's lacklustre
approach to anti-money laundering (AML) and countering the financing
of terrorism (CFT). “They were on the FATF gray
list for several years, and were removed because they enacted laws
that codified the approach to terrorist financing, but at the
end-of-the-day it was a bureaucratic manoeuvre,
as it didn't necessarily make the place safer from a AML and CFT
perspective,” said Jonathan Schanzer, the vice president for
research at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, in Washington
DC.
Gateway
to the Front
On
several fronts Turkey is not playing ball according to international
AML/CTF rules say experts, frustrating international efforts to curb
financing to the likes of IS. Its border with Syria and Iraq is “like
Swiss cheese”, said Yesilada, and the country is still an entry
point for Islamic fighters, over four years after the conflict
started in Syria in 2011.
“Even
today for Westerners seeking to join IS, they get a one way ticket
[to Turkey], and make their way east. Apparently crossing the border
[into Syria] is not challenging. Border issues are among those
tracked by FATF, and this one has gone rather undocumented. Turkey is
due for an evaluation as the deficiencies are clear,” said
Schanzer. However, FATF scrutiny will not happen any time soon –
the country's next mutual evaluation report (MER) is slated for
release in 2019.
Law
and effect
CFT
legislation that Ankara adopted to avoid an earlier threat of being
expelled from FATF in 2013 – the Law
on the Prevention of the Financing of Terrorism -
included freezing and confiscation
of assets, but the question of enforcement remains. The US State
Department is among
those with concerns – stating, in June 2015, that while the
government “has issued freezing orders without delay (three to five
days), it remains unknown whether any assets have actually been
frozen”.
FATF
and the US have also criticised
Ankara for not having a wider and more international approach to
combating terrorist financing. “Efforts to counter international
terrorism are hampered by legislation that defines terrorism narrowly
as a crime targeting the Turkish state or Turkish citizens,” stated
the US State Department's 2015 country report.
A
mute point
So
it is odd that the Turkish government has avoided being flagged for
its CFT deficiencies by FATF and other agencies. Some say this is
because of Turkey's strategic importance to NATO, with the Incirlik
air base being used for strikes against IS, and to the European Union
(EU) in tackling the Syrian refugee crisis. “Because
Turkey is a NATO country and not a basket case like Sudan or Iran,
they are able to get away with quite a bit. There is a sense among
Western policy makers that its a bit dangerous to air [concerns] and
tackle them head on, so instead they kick the can down the road on
illicit activities in Turkey,” added Schanzer.
Reporting,
supervision, prosecution
Meanwhile,
evidence that concerns about Turkey's AML and CFT regime are
warranted continue to pile up. According to a 2013 report by the
country's interior, justice and finance ministries, no judicial
investigations into terrorist financing had ever been conducted. But
following FATF's threat to demote Ankara from the gray to the black
list, the finance ministry’s Financial Crimes Investigation Board
(MASAK) has been a bit more active. In its latest report, on fiscal
year 2014, 0.4% of all suspicious activity reports (SARs) were
related to terrorism, while out of 623 judicial notices issued, 10
were related to terrorist financing, compared to 117 related to tax
evasion and 83 to fraud.
“MASAK
has fined banks for failing to have the necessary AML mechanisms in
place, but not many, if any, individual convictions for financial
crime have resulted from SARs or MASAK intelligence,” said a
London-based financial crime researcher who focuses on Turkey and
asked for anonymity. MASAK did not respond to interview requests from
MLB.
Political
influence
Disquiet
over judicial inaction has also been fuelled by the dropping of a
high-profile case that surfaced in December 2013, in which four
ministers and the son of the then Prime Minister (and now President),
Recep Erdoğan, were accused of being involved in a 'gas for gold'
deal when an alleged US$13 billion was traded between Turkey and
Iran, in breach of international sanctions.
“The
judiciary has removed all the prosecutors and judges responsible for
those trials from the profession. The parliament has also acquitted
the four ministers named in the indictments,” said Yesilada.
Nor
was any judicial action taken following a Turkish prosecutor's report
in 2013 into some US$100
billion in illicit transfers from Turkey to
Iran to circumvent the multilateral sanctions against Tehran. “The
report was essentially scuttled,” said Schanzer. “The entire
(judicial) process is completely devoid of transparency, so there are
serious problems.”
Discontinuance
of such cases is widely considered to be politically motivated, part
of the ruling Justice and Development Party's (AKP) consolidation of
power within the country which, since 2013, has included overhauling
the judiciary to remove supporters of political leader Fethullah
Gulen. The state has also been increasingly heavy handed with
academics and media outlets speaking out against the AKP; in March,
the government seized control of Zaman,
one of the country's leading private newspapers.
“The
AKP has managed to have control over who it appoints. As a result you
don't have the separation of powers in a democracy between the
executive, legislative and the judicial branches. It doesn't
necessarily exist in Turkey at the moment, so it's hard to talk of
the rule of law. As a system, you don't see prosecutions in cases
where the government or those affiliated are accused,” said the
financial crime researcher.
Indeed,
the overhauling of the judiciary extended to members of the police
force as well as ministries and the central bank. On top of political
meddling in the legal process, it has left government bodies without
experienced personnel.
“The
purging of people from institutions has hurt institutions somehow. In
their defence, I'm not saying they're not functioning, but they've
lost a lot of human capital, experienced people who were not with the
AKP. Now there's no one to replace them,” said Emre Deliveli, an
independent economist based in Turkey.
Photo from Wikicommons, by Arild Vågen